With regard to Zanussi dishwashers though, maybe the slimline racks are still a decent design on the newer models. Makes you wonder why the other machines were so deep in comparison to this. Quite a big saving in cabinet depth for a relatively small trade-off in load capacity though.
It would make the FL853 a rare model these days i would think. Maybe the Studio range came in later in the 90s, when the white facia machines were launched. Not something i was aware of Zanussi doing as i also thought they used the Studio range for the small capacity versions. Yeah i was curious about the slimline bit, but now that aegokocarat has given the model number (albeit appearing somewhat abrupt) i've had a dig around and can see the FL853 is only 16.5" in depth & has a 4kg drum, compared to the 22.7" depth my 4.5kg FL1012 is. The 1000rpm 4.5kg version is the FL1032 i believe. If it's 4.5kg then that's the standard size for that era of Zanussi, but if it's only 4kg then it would be smaller in depth to normal. I think your nans washer would be an FL832. What theyre like for reliability though, im not sure. The house is rented now but if i'd stayed there i mightve changed it for a Whirlpool 6th Sense or one of the Hoover Nextras as i quite liked the look of them. I stupidly didn't pay much attention to it at the time, just trusted it'd be fine as it was Zanussi & my parents old DW907 from the 90s was well laid out. Like Matt, i found the top rack especially badly laid out. Mines the ZDF511 with the push buttons for the programs. How nothing breaks i'll never know.Īegokocarat youve got the same generation dishwasher as i've got in my house. Just think how bored you'd be by now if your Mum had bought an FJS1397W - many of them are still working today! They go bloody nuts on spin though, move more from side to side than they do round n round.
0 kommentar(er)
